Pat Messes with Nigerian Scammers (part 1)
So my buddy Pat responds to an e-mail about a financial windfall.
From: Barclays Bank London Plc UK [mailto:barclaysbank@barclaysbank.co.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 7:59 AM
Subject: CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
BARCLAYS BANK LONDON UK
Head Office Address:
Knightbridge International Centre
P.O.Box 9042
Bowater House
68 Knightbridge
London SW1X 7 BW
Telex: /Barclays / 6645BLYS 20/October/2009
+447024044403
+447024044428
Attn:Sir/Madam
Top of the day to you sir, I am writing in respect of funds deposited Mr Benny Wright, of Overseas Credit Commission O.C.C, this is as a result of your inability to complete all necessary process in getting your funds transferred to you via diplomatic shipping process, however due to the laws of the united kingdom restricting security companies of keeping cash worth millions on a particular time limit, the Overseas credit commission ,St James diplomatic security shipping company and Barclays bank signed a memorandum of understanding for you funds to be transferred to you via the following options
(1)Payment via Check, this is normally the oldest form of transfer which involves the recipient upon receiving of check deposit his or her check to the bank for clearance of funds to recipients account,
(2)Via International Telex wire transfer this is used by banks to transfer funds and from bank to banks in any part of the world with approximately 0% of any form of delay or mishap during transfer. This can be done after all Requirements has been met
Kindly indicate the option you think will be suitable for you, and please get back to me as soon as possible because the Bank awaits your issuance directive
NB:Call my drect number for much needed informations.+447035926533
Ruben Crosssbridge
Foreign Remmittance Manager
Barclays Bank Plc
On 10/21/09, Patrick McManus <mcmanusla@gmail.com> wrote: To my dear friend Messr. Crossbridge,
Good evening Gentleman.
Your email has come as a most unusual albeit most welcome surprise. To what may I ask have I earned such a trusted honor as be designated the sole recipient?
Upon further review hencetoforth of the presented options, I would prefer option 1 as being most very well preferred. If this still is a suitable option, I think the appropriate next step would be to discuss any logistic hurdles with which we may face. I’m confident that some mutually beneficial options can be arranged. Look forward to hearing your thoughts, and it has been a pleasure doing good business with you today.
With Warmest and Kindest regards,
Charles Kavenford
